ArticleBMC nursing2025
Evaluation of clinical decision-making perception of nursing students: the Aegean region case.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical learning environment is crucial for developing essential clinical decision-making skills in nursing students. This study examined nursing students' perceptions of clinical decision-making and the factors that impact it.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out using a self-administered questionnaire, which included a personal information form and the Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS). The study was conducted across ten universities in the Aegean region. Data collection took place at times most convenient for the students, such as during class sessions or lunch breaks. Prior to participation, students were briefed on the study's objectives and procedures. Those who agreed to participate provided informed consent before completing the questionnaire. Researchers remained present while students filled out the questionnaire to clarify any questions they had.
resultsA considerable proportion of students (72.6%) had never received formal education on clinical decision-making. The average CDMNS score was 140.24 ± 17.04, aligning with findings from previous research. A statistically significant difference was observed in the total mean CDMNS score and sub-dimension scores (searching for alternatives, questioning goals and values, evaluating outcomes, seeking information, and objectively integrating new knowledge) based on the university attended (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe findings suggest that nursing students in the Aegean Region demonstrated a moderate level of perceived clinical decision-making skills. To enhance these skills further, it is recommended that alternative educational approaches, such as simulation-based training, case study discussions, and mentoring programmes, be integrated into nursing education and their effectiveness assessed. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.