ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Diagnostic accuracy of visual triage checklist in early recognition of COVID-19 cases in the pediatric population: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare facilities developed surveillance systems to identify patients suspected of having COVID-19 to segregate them during their hospital stay. As a part of this infection control strategy, the Ministry of Health in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia developed a visual triage (VT) checklist for early screening and isolation of patients in the hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of this visual triage checklist in identifying children with COVID-19.
methodsThis was a retrospective, single center study that included all children who were tested for COVID-19 and were admitted to the hospital through the pediatric emergency department. The diagnostic accuracy of the visual triage checklist was assessed using COVID-19 PCR as the gold standard.
resultsA total of 1333 patients were included. The visual triage checklist had a sensitivity of 94.3% (95% CI: 87.2-98.1) and a specificity of 16.0% (95% CI: 14-18) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.55 (0.53-0.58). The positive predictive value of the checklist was low at 7.35% (95% CI: 5.9-9.0).
conclusionThe VT checklist has high sensitivity, and is therefore potentially useful as an initial screening tool. However, the diagnosis of COVID-19 requires early secondary confirmation to avoid the large number of false positive cases associated with this tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.