ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Surgical consent, perception of the patients who underwent a surgical operation in the Kurdistan region, Iraq.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Standardized Perioperative Care Program and Postoperative Pain, Disability, and Knowledge Among Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery in Erbil, Iraq: A Non-Randomized Controlled Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Perceptions of Surgical Informed Consent Communication in Elective General Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient satisfaction is a significant measure of healthcare service quality as the patient is the center of any surgical procedure. Patient satisfaction refers to the extent to which a patient's expectations of optimal care align with their perception of the care received. Patient satisfaction during informed consent is enhanced when written informed consent is accompanied by verbal consent in the preoperative period. Satisfied patients are more inclined to adhere to therapy, engage actively in their care, utilize healthcare services, willingly partake in decision-making, and remain with a healthcare provider. This research examines the practical and ethical considerations of obtaining informed consent during surgical procedures. To better understand and make informed decisions, this study aims to assess the efficacy of present consent methods and pinpoint obstacles patients encounter. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to December 2024. Data were gathered by second-year students from Koya University's Faculty of General Medicine by interviewing postoperative patients who had undergone general surgical procedures. The results were entered into a Google form and analyzed using SPSS27.
resultsIn interviews with participants, 430 out of 572 patients (75%) indicated trust in their surgeons performing the surgery, while 525 patients (91%) expressed respect for their surgeons' opinions. However, 41% (239 patients) reported not reading the informed consent form, and a similar percentage denied that the details of the form were explained by the medical staff responsible for the surgery as there are some medical terms or situations in the form that are challenging to assume if not explained.
conclusionCompared to others, participants with a higher educational level sought extensive time from the responsible surgeons to discuss every detail of the surgery before signing the informed consent, with a statistically significant difference observed. A similar difference was noted between private and public hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.