Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316983›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Participatory modeling meets African swine fever - Systems Thinking in action.

Lisa Rogoll, Katja Schulz, Jana Schulz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa RogollInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany. lisa.rogoll@fli.de.
Katja SchulzInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
Jana SchulzInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite concerted efforts to control the disease, African swine fever (ASF) continues to spread in numerous regions across Europe. The circulation of the virus in wild boar populations poses an ongoing risk of transmission to domestic pig holdings and results in significant socio-economic losses. Controlling ASF in wild boar has proven to be a complex endeavor that affects many different sectors of society, with different focal points of interest and potential for conflict. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of stakeholder challenges and identify leverage points for effective interventions, a multidisciplinary Systems Thinking approach was applied. Participatory modeling workshops were conducted in an ASF-affected area of Germany with stakeholders from public institutions, forestry, conservation, agriculture, and the food industry in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the stakeholders' perception of the complex system of ASF control. Causal Loop Diagrams were developed jointly with stakeholders to capture and visualize the interconnections within the system from stakeholders' perspective.

resultsDuring the workshops, participants emphasized the need for transparent and rapid communication among all affected stakeholders and the importance of of raising public awareness about ASF for an effective response to outbreaks. Participants identified the complexity of the ASF control system, represented by a preliminary Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) with 260 loops, including 131 balancing and 129 reinforcing loops. These feedback processes illustrate the dynamic and interconnected nature of ASF control efforts, highlighting both challenges and opportunities for intervention. In addition, the participants stressed the need for early preparation of relevant resources for potential ASF outbreaks. Effectiveness and unintended consequences of control measures represented a major concern for the participants. Furthermore, participants emphasized the need to standardize and harmonize processes across different regions of Germany to improve the effectiveness of ASF control efforts.

conclusionThe findings underscore the importance of integrating stakeholder insights into the design of ASF control measures to ensure their effectiveness and sustainability. The complexity of the system, as represented by the numerous feedback loops, highlights the need for adaptive and collaborative approaches in managing ASF outbreaks. Moving forward, discussions with scientists and decision-makers will be essential to refine and implement these insights into actionable strategies for effective ASF management. Engaging stakeholders in the modeling process fosters ownership, collaboration, and compliance, which are crucial for successful implementation of ASF control measures. Furthermore, transdisciplinary research is providing valuable insights for regions or countries yet unaffected by ASF, helping them prepare effectively for potential outbreaks.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAnimalsDisease OutbreaksGermanySus scrofaSwineAfrican swine feverCausal loop diagramGermanyParticipatory modelingStakeholder involvementSystems thinkingWild boar

Identifiers

PMID40316983
PMCPMC12046707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.