SynthesisBMC urology2025
Safety and efficacy of standard vs. tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric populations: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of size: a systematic review and meta-analysis of tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 2171 adult patients.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Vacuum-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sheaths in pediatric supine mini-PCNL: a comparative analysis.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in pediatric populations.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. Two authors independently screened the literature and extracted data. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. This study has been prospectively registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024622238). Sensitivity analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 to assess the impact of low-quality studies, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.
resultsA total of 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 case-control studies were included, comprising 661 cases. The meta-analysis revealed that, in pediatric populations, the tubeless PCNL group had significantly shorter hospital stays compared to the standard PCNL group (WMD = -1.60, 95% CI: -2.27 to -0.92, P < 0.01), as well as shorter operative times (WMD = -2.06, 95% CI: -4.02 to -0.10, P = 0.04). The stone clearance rate was higher in the tubeless PCNL group than in the standard group (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.09 to 4.34, P = 0.03). Additionally, the tubeless PCNL group had lower rates of postoperative fever (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.78, P < 0.01) and postoperative urine leakage (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.50, P < 0.01) compared to the standard group. The tubeless PCNL group also had shorter pain management times (WMD = -2.00, 95% CI: -2.44 to -1.56, P < 0.01) and lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores (WMD = -2.52, 95% CI: -2.81 to -2.22, P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of hemoglobin decline, overall complications (including perinephric fluid collections, urinary tract infections, and blood transfusion requirements), and reoperation rates.
conclusionIn children with kidney stones and low stone burden or an uneventful procedure, tubeless PCNL offers clear clinical advantages, including shorter hospital stays, higher stone clearance rates, and lower postoperative fever. Additionally, it improves surgical efficiency, reduces postoperative complications, and decreases the need for analgesia. These benefits suggest that tubeless PCNL can be safely applied in pediatric patients, yielding outcomes comparable to standard PCNL, provided that indications are properly managed". CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.