Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316966›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2025

Machine learning-based Diagnostic model for determining the etiology of pleural effusion using Age, ADA and LDH.

Qing-Yu Chen, Shu-Min Yin, Ming-Ming Shao, Feng-Shuang Yi, Huan-Zhong Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qing-Yu ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Shu-Min YinDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Ming-Ming ShaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Feng-Shuang YiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China. yifengshuang@ccmu.edu.cn.
Huan-Zhong ShiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China. shihuanzhong@sina.com.

Funding

Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program QML20230303Beijing Scholars Program 048National Natural Science Foundation of China 82200111Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7232066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClassification of the etiologies of pleural effusion is a critical challenge in clinical practice. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on a simple cut-off method based on the laboratory tests. However, machine learning (ML) offers a novel approach based on artificial intelligence to improving diagnostic accuracy and capture the non-linear relationships.

methodA retrospective study was conducted using data from patients diagnosed with pleural effusion. The dataset was divided into training and test set with a ratio of 7:3 with 6 machine learning algorithms implemented to diagnosis pleural effusion. Model performances were assessed by accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Feature importance and average prediction of age, Adenosine (ADA) and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was analyzed. Decision tree was visualized.

resultsA total of 742 patients were included (training cohort: 522, test cohort: 220), 397 (53.3%) diagnosed with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and 253 (34.1%) with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) in the cohort. All of the 6 models performed well in the diagnosis of MPE, TPE and transudates. Extreme Gradient Boosting and Random Forest performed better in the diagnosis of the MPE, with F1 scores above 0.890, while K-Nearest Neighbors and Tabular Transformer performed better in the diagnosis of the TPE, with F1 scores above 0.870. ADA was identified as the most important feature. The ROC of machine learning model outperformed those of conventional diagnostic thresholds.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that ML models using age, ADA, and LDH can effectively classify the etiologies of pleural effusion, suggesting that ML-based approaches may enhance diagnostic decision-making.

Indexed as

Adenosine DeaminaseL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMachine LearningPleural EffusionPleural Effusion, MalignantAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAdenosine DeaminaseBiomarkersL-Lactate DehydrogenaseAdenosine deaminaseDiagnostic modelMachine learningPleural effusion

Identifiers

PMID40316966
PMCPMC12048966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.