ReviewBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Sex disparities in cystic fibrosis in the era of highly effective modulator treatment.
Review in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cystic Fibrosis and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Reprogramming of the Intestinal Epithelial Niche and Cell-State Plasticity in the CFTR Modulator Era.Cell proliferation · 2026Review
- Article
- Could the Phenotypic Outcomes of Genetic Variability in Cells Operating in Mechanically Dynamic Environments be Influenced by a Disrupted "Cell-ECM" Relationship? Using Cystic Fibrosis and Marfan Syndrome as an Example.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Evolution and Prognostic Variables of Cystic Fibrosis in Children and Young Adults: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder characterized by progressive lung disease and extra-pulmonary manifestations with notable sex disparities in disease outcomes. In this review we summarize the underlying mechanisms driving this sex disparity, with a particular focus on the role of sex hormones on CF lung disease pathophysiology. We explore how the introduction of highly effective modulator therapies (HEMT) may impact sex differences in outcomes and assess whether they have the potential to close the sex gap. While treatment with HEMT has led to better outcomes in the CF population as a whole, females with CF continue to experience worse pulmonary morbidity than males. There is a need for continued research in this area, particularly into the influence and therapeutic potential of sex hormones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.