Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316876›Full record

ReviewBiologia futura2025

The importance of understanding the ethology and ecology of the zebrafish, and of other fish species, in experimental research.

Robert Gerlai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biologia futura, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert GerlaiDepartment of Psychology, Rm CCT4004, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada. robert_gerlai@yahoo.com.

Funding

NSERC 311637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This short review appears in a special issue assembled to celebrate the 90th birthday of a Hungarian ethologist, Professor Vilmos Csányi. As such, it includes some autobiographical details specific to that scientist and the author of this review. However, these details also serve an important general message. They exemplify how science, i.e., specifically the use of fish in the analysis of behaviour and brain function progressed from the mid-1970s to the current day. They illuminate how scientists choose their study species, and how this choice influences the research questions one may be able to pose. The review discusses why the zebrafish has become a popular research subject of biology, including behavioural neuroscience. It argues that behavioural analysis should be an integral part of research into the analysis of brain function. It considers the dichotomy between the historical effect of North American behaviourism vs. the legacy of European Nobel laureate ethologists. It demonstrates, through a theoretical example, why merging these two "schools" of thoughts is the appropriate way to conduct behavioural research. It provides a few examples for how combining knowledge of ethology and ecology of the species with systematic laboratory studies may be beneficial. And it presents a brief outlook for the future of fish in biology research.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalEcologyEthologyFishesZebrafishAnimalsBehavioural neuroscienceBrain functionError variationEthologyNatural behaviourZebrafish

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.