ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
On lexical and sublexical contributions to transposed-phoneme priming effects.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoupling speech processing from time.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speech input like [byt] has been shown to facilitate not only the subsequent processing of an identical target word /byt/ but also that of a target word /tyb/ that contains the same phonemes in a different order. In the TISK model of spoken word recognition (Hannagan et al., Frontiers in psychology, 4, 563, 2013), this transposed-phoneme priming effect could result from the activation of shared position-independent phonemes (i.e., a sublexical effect) or pre-activation of the lexical representation corresponding to the transposed-phoneme target word by the prime (i.e., a lexical effect). In this study, we aimed to distinguish sublexical and lexical contributions to transposed-phoneme priming effects by (1) manipulating the lexical status of primes, and (2) examining if transposed-phoneme effects occur when targets are nonwords. An inhibitory transposed-phoneme priming effect was observed when target nonwords (e.g., /tad/) were preceded by transposed-phoneme word primes (e.g., /dat/). In contrast, there was a small non-significant facilitatory priming effect when target nonwords (e.g., /nuk/) were preceded by transposed-phoneme nonword primes (/kun/). These findings point to a greater contribution of lexical representations than sublexical representations in driving transposed-phoneme priming effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40316825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.