Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316815›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2025

Towards a personalized happiness approach to capturing change in satisfaction.

Emorie D Beck, Felix Cheung, Stuti Thapa, Joshua J Jackson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emorie D BeckDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. edbeck@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8152-3510
Felix CheungDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7826-7405
Stuti ThapaDepartment of Psychology, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0740-7204
Joshua J JacksonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9490-8890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary approaches examining the determinants of happiness have posited that happiness is determined bidirectionally by both top-down, global life satisfaction and bottom-up, domain satisfaction processes. We propose a personalized happiness perspective, suggesting that the determinants and consequences of happiness are idiographic (that is, specific) to each individual rather than assumed to be the same for all. We showed the utility of a personalized happiness approach by testing associations between life and domain satisfaction at both the population and personalized levels using nationally representative data of 40,074 German, British, Swiss, Dutch and Australian participants tracked for up to 33 years. The majority of participants (41.4-50.8%) showed primarily unidirectional associations between domain satisfactions and life satisfaction, and only 19.3-25.9% of participants showed primarily bidirectional associations. Moreover, the population models differed from personalized models, suggesting that aggregated, population-level research fails to capture individual differences in personalized happiness, showing the importance of a personalized happiness approach. Patterns of individual differences are robust, yet distinguishing between individual-level patterns and random error is challenging, highlighting the need for future work and innovative approaches to study personalized happiness.

Indexed as

HappinessPersonal SatisfactionAdultFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.