Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316765›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Small language models learn enhanced reasoning skills from medical textbooks.

Hyunjae Kim, Hyeon Hwang, Jiwoo Lee, Sihyeon Park, Dain Kim, Taewhoo Lee, Chanwoong Yoon, Jiwoong Sohn, Jungwoo Park, Olga Reykhart and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Small language models in medicine.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Domain-adapted language model using reinforcement learning for various dementias.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Token-Level Attribution for Transparent Biomedical AI.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hyunjae KimKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon HwangKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiwoo LeeKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sihyeon ParkKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dain KimKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Taewhoo LeeKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chanwoong YoonKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiwoong SohnKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jungwoo ParkKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Olga ReykhartYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Thomas FetherstonYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Donghee ChoiImperial College London, London, UK.
Soo Heon KwakSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Qingyu ChenYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jaewoo KangKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. kangj@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HR20C0021(3)Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea IITP-2024-2020-0-0181National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2023R1A2C3004176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small language models (SLM) offer promise for medical applications by addressing the privacy and hardware constraints of large language models; however, their limited parameters (often fewer than ten billion) hinder multi-step reasoning for complex medical tasks. This study presents Meerkat, a new family of medical SLMs designed to be lightweight while enhancing reasoning capabilities. We begin by designing an effective and efficient training method. This involves extracting high-quality chain-of-thought reasoning paths from 18 medical textbooks, which are then combined with diverse instruction-following datasets within the medical domain, totaling 441K training examples. Fine-tuning was conducted on open-source SLMs using this curated dataset. Our Meerkat-7B and Meerkat-8B models outperformed their counterparts by 22.3% and 10.6% across six exam datasets, respectively. They also improved scores on the NEJM Case Challenge from 7 to 16 and from 13 to 20, surpassing the human score of 13.7. Additionally, they demonstrated superiority in expert evaluations, excelling in all metrics-completeness, factuality, clarity, and logical consistency-of reasoning abilities.

Identifiers

PMID40316765
PMCPMC12048634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.