ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Automatic gesture recognition and evaluation in peg transfer tasks of laparoscopic surgery training.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic surgery training is gaining increasing importance. To release doctors from the burden of manually annotating videos, we proposed an automatic surgical gesture recognition model based on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) and the Chinese Laparoscopic Skills Testing and Assessment (CLSTA) tools. Furthermore, statistical analysis was conducted based on a gesture vocabulary that had been designed to examine differences between groups at different levels.
methodsBased on the CLSTA, the training process of peg transfer can be represented by a standard sequence of seven surgical gestures defined in our gesture vocabulary. The dataset used for model training and testing included eighty videos recorded at 30 fps. All videos were rated by senior medical professionals from our medical training center. The dataset was processed using cross-validation to ensure robust model performance. The model applied is 3D ResNet-18, a convolutional neural network (CNN). An LSTM neural network was utilized to refine the output sequence.
resultsThe overall accuracy for the recognition model was 83.8% and the F1 score was 84%. The LSTM network improved model performance to 85.84% accuracy and an 85% F1 score. Every operative process starts with Gesture 1 (G1) and ends with G5, with wrong placement is labeled as G6. The average training time is 92 s (SD = 36). Variance was observed between groups for G1, G3, and G6, indicating that trainees may benefit from focusing their efforts on these relevant operations, while assisting doctors also in more effectively analyzing the training outcome.
conclusionAn automatic surgical gesture recognition model was developed for the peg transfer task. We also defined a gesture vocabulary along with the artificial intelligence model to sequentially describe the training operation. This provides an opportunity for artificial intelligence-enabled objective and automatic evaluation based on CLSTA in the clinic implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40316752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.