ArticleScientific reports2025
Detecting the left atrial appendage in CT localizers using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with cardioembolic stroke often undergo CT of the left atrial appendage (LAA), for example, to determine whether thrombi are present in the LAA. To guide the imaging process, technologists first perform a localizer scan, which is a preliminary image used to identify the region of interest. However, the lack of well-defined landmarks makes accurate delimitation of the LAA in localizers difficult and often requires whole-heart scans, increasing radiation exposure and cancer risk. This study aims to automate LAA delimitation in CT localizers using deep learning. Four commonly used deep networks (VariFocalNet, Cascade-R-CNN, Task-aligned One-stage Object Detection Network, YOLO v11) were trained to predict the LAA boundaries on a cohort of 1253 localizers, collected retrospectively from a single center. The best-performing network in terms of delimitation accuracy was then evaluated on an internal test cohort of 368 patients, and on an external test cohort of 309 patients. The VariFocalNet performed best, achieving LAA delimitations with high accuracy (97.8% and 96.8%; Dice coefficients: 90.4% and 90.0%) and near-perfect clinical utility (99.8% and 99.3%). Compared to whole-heart scanning, the network-based delimitation reduced the radiation exposure by more than 50% (5.33 ± 6.42 mSv vs. 11.35 ± 8.17 mSv in the internal cohort, 4.39 ± 4.23 mSv vs. 10.09 ± 8.0 mSv in the external cohort). This study demonstrates that a deep learning network can accurately delimit the LAA in the localizer, leading to more accurate CT scans of the LAA, thereby significantly reducing radiation exposure to the patient compared to whole-heart scanning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.