ArticleLeukemia2025
TP53 and CDKN2A alterations define a poor prognostic subgroup in patients with nodal T follicular helper cell lymphoma.
Article in Leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide CRISPR screens identify an RXR-MYLIP-LDLR axis regulating BH3 mimetic sensitivity in peripheral T-cell lymphomas.Oncogene · 2026Article
- PLK1 inhibition enhances Brentuximab vedotin efficacy in CD30-positive T-cell lymphoma via spindle assembly checkpoint activation.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms of Epstein-Barr Virus in the pathogenesis of lymphomas and new opportunities for precision medicine.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Integrating genomic and transcriptome features for characterization and prognostic prediction of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nodal T follicular helper cell lymphoma (nTFHL) exhibits unique immunophenotypes and somatic alterations, while the prognostic value of these alterations remains unclear. By analyzing 173 nTFHL cases, we identified 36 driver genes, including 4 novel ones (TET3, HLA-C, NRAS, and KLF2). Then, we classified nTFHL cases into four molecular subgroups by major driver alterations. TR-I (+) and TR-I (-) were characterized by TET2 and/or RHOA mutations with and without IDH2 mutations; AC53 by TP53 and/or CDKN2A alterations and aneuploidy; and NSD with no subgroup-defining alterations (namely without any of the above alterations). AC53 exhibited the worst survival, while NSD, particularly those lacking driver alterations, showed the best prognosis. nTFHL had a better prognosis than peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, when TP53 and/or CDKN2A alterations were absent. Multivariable analyses showed that AC53, the presence of driver alterations, and international prognostic index high-risk were independently associated with worse survival. Finally, we developed a simple prognostic index (mTFHL-PI), which classified patients into three risk categories with a median OS of 181, 67, and 20 months, respectively. Our study identifies novel prognostic factors, namely TP53 and/or CDKN2A alterations and the presence of driver alterations, demonstrating the clinical relevance of molecular classification in nTFHL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40316697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.