Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316683›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Training a convolutional neural network for exoplanet classification with transit photometry data.

Juliana Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Juliana WangPolygence, São Paulo, Brazil. jewbmewb@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for exoplanets aims to identify planets with compositions similar to Earth's, providing insights into planetary formation and habitability. As a result, efforts to enhance the efficiency of exoplanet research have led to the development of various detection methods, including transit photometry. Despite their effectiveness, these methods produce data that require detailed interpretation, such as identifying dips in light curves. Machine learning has then emerged as a powerful alternative, offering rapid image classification and the ability to analyze complex datasets in a short span of time. This paper applies a convolutional neural network (CNN) to the Kepler dataset, which consists of time-series light curve data from the Kepler Space Telescope, used for detecting exoplanets through transit events. The final CNN architecture, with hyperparameters set as (300, 200, 200, 100, 100), was identified as the best-performing model after evaluating multiple configurations. These results highlight the model's strengths and areas for improvement; while it excels at identifying false positives (low miss rate of 5%), its higher miss rate for the 'CONFIRMED' class (40%) suggests a need for better detection of true exoplanets. The AUC score of 0.91 further underscores the model's strong overall performance.

Indexed as

Computational astrophysicsExoplanet detectionMachine learningNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID40316683
PMCPMC12048670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.