Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316651›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A study of combination of autoencoders and boosted Big-Bang crunch theory architectures for Land-Use classification using remotely sensed imagery.

Qiongbing Xiong, Xuecheng Wu, Cizhen Yu, Hasan Hosseinzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiongbing XiongCollege of Tourism Management, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550014, China.
Xuecheng WuCollege of Tourism Management, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550014, China. wxcguc@163.com.
Cizhen YuCollege of Tourism Management, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550014, China.
Hasan HosseinzadehArdabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran. hasanhosseinzadeh73@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research introduced a new method for land-use classification by merging deep convolutional neural networks with a modified variant of a metaheuristic optimization technique. The methodology involved utilizing the VGG-19 model for feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and a stacked autoencoder optimized with a boosted version of the Big Bang Crunch Theory. Through testing on the Aerial Image Dataset the and UC Merced Land Use Dataset and comparing it with other published works, the approach showed higher classification accuracy compared to current state-of-the-art methods. The study revealed that incorporating boosted Big-Bang Crunch significantly enhances the performance of stacked autoencoder in land-use classification tasks. Moreover, comparisons with other techniques, including convolutional neural networks, Cascaded Residual Dilated Networks, hierarchical convolutional recurrent neural networks, Fusion Region Proposal Networks, and multi-level context-guided classification techniques using Object-Based Convolutional Neural Networks, emphasized the benefits of using Convolutional Neural Network models over traditional methods. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 92.49% on the AID dataset and 95.93% on the UC Merced dataset, with precision scores of 98.64% and 98.93%, respectively. These results emphasize the importance of integrating deep learning architectures with sophisticated optimization techniques, contributing to enhanced land-use classification accuracy.

Indexed as

Boosted Big-Bang crunch theoryDeep learningLand-use classificationMetaheuristicStacked autoencoderVGG-19

Identifiers

PMID40316651
PMCPMC12048631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.