ArticleScientific reports2025
Retraining and evaluation of machine learning and deep learning models for seizure classification from EEG data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An edge-AI enabled wearable platform for real-time epileptic seizure detection with geolocated alerting.BMC biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Hybrid Spike-Encoded Spiking Neural Networks for Real-Time EEG Seizure Detection: A Comparative Benchmark.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is one of the most used techniques to perform diagnosis of epilepsy. However, manual annotation of seizures in EEG data is a major time-consuming step in the analysis process of EEGs. Different machine learning models have been developed to perform automated detection of seizures from EEGs. However, a large gap is observed between initial accuracies and those observed in clinical practice. In this work, we reproduced and assessed the accuracy of a large number of models, including deep learning networks, for detection of seizures from EEGs. Benchmarking included three different datasets for training and initial testing, and a manually annotated EEG from a local patient for further testing. Random forest and a convolutional neural network achieved the best results on public data, but a large reduction of accuracy was observed testing with the local data, especially for the neural network. We expect that the retrained models and the data available in this work will contribute to the integration of machine learning techniques as tools to improve the accuracy of diagnosis in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.