Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316648›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Retraining and evaluation of machine learning and deep learning models for seizure classification from EEG data.

Juan Pablo Carvajal-Dossman, Laura Guio, Danilo García-Orjuela, Jennifer J Guzmán-Porras, Kelly Garces, Andres Naranjo, Silvia Juliana Maradei-Anaya, Jorge Duitama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan Pablo Carvajal-DossmanSystem and computing engineering department, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia.
Laura GuioHOMI, Fundación Hospital Pediátrico La Misericordia, Bogota, Colombia.
Danilo García-OrjuelaBiotecnología y Genética SAS, Biotecgen, Bogota, Colombia.
Jennifer J Guzmán-PorrasHOMI, Fundación Hospital Pediátrico La Misericordia, Bogota, Colombia.
Kelly GarcesSystem and computing engineering department, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia.
Andres NaranjoHOMI, Fundación Hospital Pediátrico La Misericordia, Bogota, Colombia.
Silvia Juliana Maradei-AnayaHOMI, Fundación Hospital Pediátrico La Misericordia, Bogota, Colombia.
Jorge DuitamaSystem and computing engineering department, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia. ja.duitama@uniandes.edu.co.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 760-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) is one of the most used techniques to perform diagnosis of epilepsy. However, manual annotation of seizures in EEG data is a major time-consuming step in the analysis process of EEGs. Different machine learning models have been developed to perform automated detection of seizures from EEGs. However, a large gap is observed between initial accuracies and those observed in clinical practice. In this work, we reproduced and assessed the accuracy of a large number of models, including deep learning networks, for detection of seizures from EEGs. Benchmarking included three different datasets for training and initial testing, and a manually annotated EEG from a local patient for further testing. Random forest and a convolutional neural network achieved the best results on public data, but a large reduction of accuracy was observed testing with the local data, especially for the neural network. We expect that the retrained models and the data available in this work will contribute to the integration of machine learning techniques as tools to improve the accuracy of diagnosis in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectroencephalographyMachine LearningSeizuresEpilepsyHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40316648
PMCPMC12048661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.