Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316646›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Viewers perceive shape in pictures according to per-fixation perspective.

Daniel Martin, Diego Gutierrez, Belen Masia, Stephen DiVerdi, Aaron Hertzmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel MartinUniversidad de Zaragoza, I3A, Zaragoza, Spain. danims@unizar.es.
Diego GutierrezUniversidad de Zaragoza, I3A, Zaragoza, Spain.
Belen MasiaUniversidad de Zaragoza, I3A, Zaragoza, Spain.
Stephen DiVerdiAdobe Research, California, USA.
Aaron HertzmannAdobe Research, California, USA.

Funding

Gobierno de Aragón Predoctoral Grant (2020-2024)MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF, EU PID2022-141539NB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How viewers interpret different pictorial projections has been a longstanding question affecting many disciplines, including psychology, art, computer science, and vision science. The most-prominent theories assume that viewers interpret pictures according to a single linear perspective projection. Yet, no existing theory accurately describes viewers' perceptions across the wide variety of projections used throughout art history. Recently, Hertzmann hypothesized that pictorial 3D shape perception is interpreted according to a separate linear perspective for each eye fixation in a picture. We performed four experiments based on this hypothesis. The first two experiments found that viewers consider object depictions as more accurate when an object is projected according to its own local linear projection, rather than one consistent with the rest of the picture. In the third experiment, viewers exhibited change blindness to projections in peripheral vision, suggesting that perception of shape primarily occurs around fixations. The fourth experiment found surface slant compensation to be dependent on fixation. We conclude that pictorial shape perception operates according to per-fixation perspective.

Identifiers

PMID40316646
PMCPMC12048510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.