ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a CT radiomics model for detection of bladder invasion by colorectal carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the feasibility of a radiomics model for the detection of bladder invasion (BI) by colorectal cancer (CRC) on CT images. Ninety-six patients with CRC and a suspicion of BI who underwent tumor resection with partial or total cystectomy were reviewed. The 96 patients were randomly assigned to the training dataset (n = 68) or test dataset (n = 28) at a ratio of 7:3. The CT images were reviewed by two experienced radiologists, who provided a CT impression of the invasion of the bladder by CRC. A region of interest (ROI) on the CT images for each case was manually labeled by two radiologists. A radiomics model was constructed using a Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) classifier. The predicted probability by CatBoost was used to evaluate the efficacy of the radiomics model. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the receiver operating characteristic were compared between the radiomics model and the CT impression. In the training dataset, the AUC of the radiomic model [0.864 (95% CI: 0.778, 0.951)] was significantly greater than that of CT impression [0.678 (95% CI: 0.569. 0.786), P = 0.007]. In the test dataset, the AUC of the radiomic model [0.883 (95% CI: 0.699, 1.000)] was also significantly greater than that of CT impression [0.570 (95% CI: 0.370, 0.770), P = 0.040]. It is feasible to use radiomics models for the prediction of BI by CRC, which might perform better than human radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.