ArticleScientific reports2025
Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Suction-assisted ureteroscopy compared with traditional ureteroscopy for renal stones ≤ 2 cm: a systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Complications of thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the EAU-YAU endourology and urolithiasis working group.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of 6.3 Fr Versus 7.5 Fr Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes for Upper Urinary Tract Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of 6.3-Fr versus 8.6-Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes for pediatric upper urinary tract stones ≤ 2 cm: a randomized controlled trial.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Pediatric Endourology Advances.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Use of Novel 6.3 Fr Ureteroscope in Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS): Comparative Experience with Conventional Ureteroscopes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patient satisfaction and scope size of flexible ureteroscopy for upper urinary stones: A comparative study, multivariate analysis and subjective and objective evaluations.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Flexible and navigable suction access sheaths: what size stone particles can be cleared?BJU international · 2026Article
- Preoperative CT imaging and machine learning models for predicting ureteral access sheath placement success in non-stented patients with ureteral calculi: a retrospective cohort study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Successful Treatment with a 6.3-Fr Disposable Digital Flexible Ureteroscope and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in a 50-Year-Old Man with Large Bilateral Ureteral Stones and Hydronephrosis.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Feasibility and Safety of Primary Ureteroscopy with Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope HU30M (6.3 Fr, HugeMed): An Initial Experience.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Initial clinical experience with 6.3 Fr single‑use flexible ureteroscope versus 8.5 Fr in retrograde intrarenal surgery with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath of variable diameters: a single‑center comparative study.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flexible ureteroscopy is a cornerstone in minimally invasive urology, providing effective management of kidney stones and other urological conditions. The emergence of single-use ureteroscopes addresses challenges associated with reusable devices, such as cross-contamination, maintenance costs, and degradation over time. This prospective, single-center study compared the performance of the 6.3 Fr single-use flexible ureteroscope to the 7.5 Fr model in the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 2 cm. Forty patients were divided into two groups of 20, with preoperative assessments including CT scans and urine cultures. All patients underwent flexible ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy under general anesthesia, and stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed via CT at one month postoperatively. The 6.3 Fr ureteroscope achieved a significantly higher SFR of 95% compared to 92.9% with the 7.5 Fr model (p = 0.042). Mean operative times were 58 min (6.3 Fr) vs. 62.5 min (7.5 Fr), with no statistically significant differences in laser time or total energy used. Energy efficiency was 0.047 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.