Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316633›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Paraphrase detection for Urdu language text using fine-tune BiLSTM framework.

Muhammad Ali Aslam, Khairullah Khan, Wahab Khan, Sajid Ullah Khan, Abdullah Albanyan, Shabbab Ali Algamdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Ali AslamDepartment of Computer Science, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, 28100, Pakistan.
Khairullah KhanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, 28100, Pakistan.
Wahab KhanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, 28100, Pakistan.
Sajid Ullah KhanDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, Al-Kharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. sk.khan@psau.edu.sa.
Abdullah AlbanyanDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, Al-Kharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Shabbab Ali AlgamdiDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, Al-Kharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2024/R/1445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated paraphrase detection is crucial for natural language processing (NL) applications like text summarization, plagiarism detection, and question-answering systems. Detecting paraphrases in Urdu text remains challenging due to the language's complex morphology, distinctive script, and lack of resources such as labelled datasets, pre-trained models, and tailored NLP tools. This research proposes a novel bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) framework to address Urdu paraphrase detection's intricacies. Our approach employs word embeddings and text preprocessing techniques like tokenization, stop-word removal, and label encoding to effectively handle Urdu's morphological variations. The BiLSTM network sequentially processes the input, leveraging both forward and backward contextual information to encode the complex syntactic and semantic patterns inherent in Urdu text. An essential contribution of this work is the creation of a large-scale Urdu Paraphrased Corpus (UPC) comprising 400,000 potential sentence pair duplicates, with 150,000 pairs manually identified as paraphrases. Our findings reveal a significant improvement in paraphrase detection performance compared to existing methods. We provide insights into the underlying linguistic features and patterns that contribute to the robustness of our framework. This resource facilitates training and evaluating Urdu paraphrase detection models. Experimental evaluations on the custom UPC dataset demonstrate our BiLSTM model's superiority, achieving 94.14% accuracy and outperforming state-of-the-art methods like CNN (83.43%) and LSTM (88.09%). Our model attains an impressive 95.34% accuracy on the benchmark Quora dataset. Furthermore, we incorporate a comprehensive linguistic rule engine to handle exceptional cases during paraphrase analysis, ensuring robust performance across diverse contexts.

Indexed as

LanguageNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsHumansSemanticsBiLSTMCNNLSTMNLPParaphrase detectionUrdu text

Identifiers

PMID40316633
PMCPMC12048677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.