Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316625›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cross language transformation of free text into structured lobectomy surgical records from a multi center study.

Xiongwen Yang, Yi Xiao, Di Liu, Huiyin Deng, Jian Huang, Yubin Zhou, Chuanzhou Dai, Jun Wu, Dan Liu, Maoli Liang and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Large Language Models in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiongwen YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, No. 83, Zhongshan East Road, Guiyang, , Guizhou, China. yangxiongwen@gz5055.com.
Yi XiaoDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Di LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, No. 83, Zhongshan East Road, Guiyang, , Guizhou, China.
Huiyin DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jian HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yubin ZhouDepartment of Dermatology, the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Chuanzhou DaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chenzhou First People's Hospital, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Jun WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xishui People's Hospital, Xishui, Guizhou, China.
Dan LiuDepartment of Medical Records and Statistics, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Maoli LiangNHC Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Immunological Diseases, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Chuan XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, No. 83, Zhongshan East Road, Guiyang, , Guizhou, China. xuchuan89757@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent study, the effectiveness of GPT-4 Omni in transforming lobectomy surgical records into structured data across multiple languages was explored. The aim was to improve both efficiency and accuracy in documenting thoracic surgical oncology procedures. Involving 466 records from seven specialized hospitals, the process started with OCR and text normalization. A manual restructuring by thoracic oncologists set the benchmark for fine-tuning Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 Omni (GPT-4o). Experts reviewed the AI's output, assessing it on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores. GPT-4o demonstrated high performance across both Chinese and English records, achieving an accuracy of 0.966, precision of 0.981, recall of 0.982, and an F1-score of 0.982 in both language settings. Results showed that GPT-4o was highly effective in both Chinese and English, significantly speeding up documentation compared to traditional methods. While it performed well across languages and reduced review times, common error types included terminology misinterpretations (2.82%), procedural sequence errors (1.41%), and omissions of key details (0.47%). While it performed well across languages and reduced review times, these limitations highlight areas for further refinement, particularly in enhancing contextual understanding and mitigating minor errors. Nonetheless, GPT-4o shows great potential in standardizing surgical records, streamlining workflows, and boosting care and research in thoracic oncology.

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsMedical RecordsPneumonectomyElectronic Health RecordsHumansLung NeoplasmsNatural Language ProcessingGenerative pre-trained transformer 4 omni (GPT-4o)LobectomyNatural language processing (NLP)Structured surgical recordsThoracic surgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID40316625
PMCPMC12048494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.