ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From black-box prediction to transparent insight: the status quo and paradigm shift of explainable artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma research.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT-derived liver fibrosis quantification independently predicts post-hepatectomy liver failure: a histologically validated study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Additive value of oncological resectability criteria for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for biomarker identification and diagnostic nomogram development in hypo-productive thrombocytopenia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Interpret Pulmonary Function Tests and Predict Prolonged Air Leaks After Lung Resection.Cancers · 2026Article
- An intelligent healthcare framework for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis based on aggregated learners from biomedical data utilising explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Risk Prediction Models for Posthepatectomy Liver Failure: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Peptide Arrays as Tools for Unraveling Tumor Microenvironments and Drug Discovery in Oncology.Cells · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a severe complication following liver surgery. We aimed to develop a novel, interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict PHLF. We enrolled 312 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy, and 30% of the samples were utilized for internal validation. Variable selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression in conjunction with random forest and recursive feature elimination (RF-RFE) algorithms. Subsequently, 12 distinct ML algorithms were employed to identify the optimal prediction model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to assess the model's predictive accuracy. Additionally, an independent prospective validation was conducted with 62 patients. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis further explained the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model. The XGBoost model exhibited the highest accuracy with AUCs of 0.983 and 0.981 in the training and validation cohorts among 12 ML models. Calibration curves and DCA confirmed the model's accuracy and clinical applicability. Compared with traditional models, the XGBoost model had a higher AUC. The prospective cohort (AUC = 0.942) further confirmed the generalization ability of the XGBoost model. SHAP identified the top three critical variables: total bilirubin (TBIL), MELD score, and ICG-R15. Moreover, the SHAP summary plot was used to illustrate the positive or negative effects of the features as influenced by XGBoost. The XGBoost model provides a good preoperative prediction of PHLF in patients with resectable HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.