Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing urban park cooling effects requires balancing morphological design and landscape structure.

Lin Wang, Wenjia Wang, Fei Tang, Hanqiu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lin WangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing of Soil Erosion and Disaster Prevention, College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Wenjia WangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing of Soil Erosion and Disaster Prevention, College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Fei TangFujian Key Laboratory of Island Monitoring and Ecological Development (Island Research Center, MNR), Fuzhou, 350116, China.
Hanqiu XuFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing of Soil Erosion and Disaster Prevention, College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China. hxu@fzu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fujian Key Laboratory of Island Monitoring and Ecological Development (Island Research Center, MNR) No.2023ZD09Fujian Province Natural Science Foundation Project No.2023J01417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization and global warming have led to more frequent extreme heat events, highlighting the importance of Park Cooling Islands. This study analyzes the cooling effect (PCE) of 50 urban parks in Fuzhou to explore the relationship between park area and cooling effect. The results indicate that there is no simple positive correlation between park area and cooling effect. Specifically, while larger parks may have greater cooling potential, a larger area does not necessarily lead to better cooling effects. The optimal park area for cooling effect ranges from 0.594 to 56 hm

Indexed as

Landscape patchPark cooling effectThreshold value of efficiencyUrban heat IslandUrban park size

Identifiers

PMID40316610
PMCPMC12048533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.