Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316605›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2025

Empowering voice assistants with TinyML for user-centric innovations and real-world applications.

Sireesha Chittepu, Sheshikala Martha, Debajyoty Banik

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sireesha ChittepuSchool of CS & AI, SR University, Warangal, India.
Sheshikala MarthaSchool of CS & AI, SR University, Warangal, India.
Debajyoty BanikSchool of Engineering, Anurag University, Hyderabad, India. debajyoty.banik@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the motivations behind integrating TinyML-based voice assistants into daily life, focusing on enhancing their user interface (UI) and functionality to improve user experience. This research discusses real-world applications like smart home automation, visually impaired assistive technologies, and healthcare monitoring. This review acknowledges various problems and helps us understand why TinyML exerts such significant implications in numerous domains. Researchers derive solutions from this study on how voice assistants integrated with TinyML can effectively analyze and adjust to user behaviour patterns in real-world scenarios, thereby enabling the delivery of dynamic and responsive content to enhance user engagement. The article also focused on limitations while implementing TinyML. Researchers will understand the detailed issues that are unavailable in most papers. This work explores features that can be embedded in voice assistants, like smart home automation, smart watches, smart glasses for visually impaired people, etc., using TinyML. A comparative review of current methods identifies areas of research gaps such as deployment difficulties, noise interference, and model efficiency on low-resource devices. From this study, researchers can directly identify the research gap with minimal effort, which may motivate them to focus more on solving the open problems due to optimize the problem identification time.

Indexed as

Self-Help DevicesUser-Computer InterfaceVoiceAutomationHumansDeep learningTinyMLTrending technologiesVoice assistant

Identifiers

PMID40316605
PMCPMC12048545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.