Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316579›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Magnetic targets positioning method based on multi-strategy improved Grey Wolf optimizer.

Binjie Lu, Zongji Li, Xiaobing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Binjie LuNaval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, Hubei, China.
Zongji LiNaval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, Hubei, China.
Xiaobing ZhangNaval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, Hubei, China. professorzxb@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12304535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic target state estimation is a widely applied technology, but it also faces many challenges in practical applications. One of the most critical challenges is the issue of estimation accuracy. The Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) is one of the more successful swarm intelligence algorithms in recent years, but its shortcomings have also been exposed when facing increasingly complex problems. Therefore, a Multi-Strategy Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer (MSIGWO) algorithm has been proposed to enhance the accuracy of magnetic target state estimation. In the initialization phase, Tent chaos mapping is introduced to enhance population diversity, prevent falling into local optima, and improve convergence speed. Multi-population fusion evolution strategies enhance population diversity, convergence accuracy, and global search ability. Nonlinear convergence factors better balance exploration and exploitation behaviors. Dynamic weight strategies increase the diversity of search samples and reduce the likelihood of falling into local optima. Adaptive dimensional learning better balances local and global searches, enhancing population diversity. Adaptive Levy flight enhances the ability to jump out of local optima and ensures convergence speed. In the CEC2018 benchmark function set of 29 benchmark function problems and magnetic target state estimation problems, the proposed MSIGWO was tested, and statistical indicators and Friedman test results show that compared with GWO and its advanced variants, the MSIGWO algorithm has superior performance. The application of this algorithm in magnetic target state estimation problems has proven its effectiveness and applicability.

Indexed as

Adaptive dimensional learningAdaptive levy flightDynamic weightsGrey Wolf optimizerMagnetic target state estimationMulti-population fusion evolutionNonlinear convergence factorTent chaos mapping

Identifiers

PMID40316579
PMCPMC12048549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.