Trial reportScientific reports2025
A cluster randomized trial comparing photoaging app and school based educational intervention for tobacco use prevention in adolescents.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06483763 (Evaluating the Impact of a Photoaging App Versus School-Based Educational Intervention on Adolescents' Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Tobacco Use in Omani Public Schools), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating the Impact of a Photoaging App Versus School-Based Educational Intervention on Adolescents' Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Tobacco Use in Omani Public Schools: A Cluster Randomized Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent tobacco use is a major public health concern, particularly in sociocultural contexts like Oman, where smoking among males is prevalent. This study evaluates two interventions: a photoaging app (PA) and a school-based educational module (SBM), designed to improve knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward tobacco use in adolescent males. A cluster randomized trial was conducted among public school boys (grades 9-12) in North Al Batinah, Oman. Schools were randomized to receive either PA or SBM interventions. PA used a smartphone app to simulate photoaging effects of smoking, while SBM employed culturally adapted modules based on WHO's Tobacco Health Hazards Toolkit. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included tobacco knowledge, susceptibility scores, and attitudes. A total of 227 students participated. Both interventions significantly improved perceptions of tobacco harm and reduced susceptibility to tobacco use. PA showed a greater effect on enhancing perceptions of harm (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31-3.20, p = 0.002), while SBM was more effective in fostering support for smoking bans (p = 0.065). Differences in susceptibility were not statistically significant between groups. Both interventions demonstrated effectiveness, with PA excelling in personalized risk communication and SBM promoting community-oriented tobacco control. Hybrid approaches could optimize adolescent tobacco prevention strategies.Trial registration: NCT06483763 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.