Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316572›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Smart weed recognition in saffron fields based on an improved EfficientNetB0 model and RGB images.

Hassan Makarian, Seyed Iman Saedi, Hossein Sahabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hassan MakarianFaculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran. h.makarian@shahroodut.ac.ir.
Seyed Iman SaediFaculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
Hossein SahabiDepartment of Plant Production, University of Torbat Heydarieh, Torbat Heydarieh, Iran.

Funding

This research has been financially supported by the Saffron Institute, University of Torbat Heydarieh, Iran. P/179506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart weed-crop discrimination is crucial for modern precision weed management. In this study, we aimed to develop a robust system for site-specific weed control in saffron fields by utilizing color images and a deep learning approach to distinguish saffron from four common weeds: flixweed, hoary cress, mouse barley, and wild garlic. A total of 504 images were taken in natural and unstructured field settings. Eight state-of-the-art deep learning networks - VGG19, ResNet152, Xception, InceptionResNetV2, EfficientNetB0, EfficientNetB1, EfficientNetV2B0, and EfficientNetV2B1 were evaluated as potential base networks. These networks underwent pre-training on ImageNet using transfer learning, followed by fine-tuning and improvement with additional layers to optimize performance on our dataset. The improved EfficientNetB0 model stood out as the top performer among the eight models, achieving an accuracy rate of 94.06% and a loss value of 0.513 on the test dataset. This proposed model excelled in accurately classifying plant categories, obtaining f1-scores ranging from 82 to 100%. We scrutinized fifteen scenarios of weed presence in saffron fields, focusing on various weed types, to propose efficient management tactics using the model. These discoveries lay the groundwork for precise saffron weed management strategies that reduce herbicide use, environmental impact, and boost yield and quality.

Indexed as

CrocusImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlant WeedsWeed ControlDeep LearningDeep learningRGB imagesSaffronSmart classificationWeed

Identifiers

PMID40316572
PMCPMC12048472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.