Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Insights into urinary catheter colonisation and polymicrobial biofilms of Candida- bacteria under flow condition.

Purvi Joshi, Rohit Bhattacharjee, Muskan Sahu, Devarshi Gajjar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Catheter mechanoprophylaxis againstMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Relevance in question: A rare case of Actinomyces radicidentis bacteremia.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Purvi JoshiDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. purvij224@gmail.com.
Rohit BhattacharjeeDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Muskan SahuDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Devarshi GajjarDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. devarshi.gajjar-microbio@msubaroda.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most hospital-acquired urinary tract infections are the result of implanted urinary catheter, with majority of studies focused on a single species colonisation, but recently polymicrobial colonisations are being reported. In this study, indwelling urinary catheters were collected from ICU patients and the colonising microbiome was isolated and identified by the traditional; culturing method and metagenomics. It was observed that majority of catheters were colonised by polymicrobial biofilms, containing both bacterial and fungal isolates making them diverse and complex. However, the metagenomics results were quite surprising showing the presence of multiple organisms of which only 1or 2 showed growth when cultured. Later, in vitro assays were performed by selecting 6 combinations, with each combination containing one Candida spp. - C. albicans or C. tropicalis with one bacteria K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or E. coli. It was observed that polymicrobial biofilms were stronger than mono-microbial biofilms, suggesting their increased surface adhesion. Furthermore, to simulate the dynamic environment in which cells are exposed to a certain level of fluid movement, a flow system was established to imitate the flow generated in colonized urinary catheter. We have observed changes in biofilm architecture, adhesion and thickness under flow conditions compared with static conditions, with a uniformly adhered biofilm with increased thickness of polymicrobial biofilms as compared to mono-species biofilms. The biofilm formed under flow was more viable than the static biofilm with higher number of live cells in flow condition.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofilmsCandidaUrinary CathetersCatheter-Related InfectionsCoinfectionEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMetagenomicsPseudomonas aeruginosaUrinary Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID40316568
PMCPMC12048485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.