ArticleScientific reports2025
Short versus long peripheral intravenous catheters in neonates: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Incidence and risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure in Japanese neonatal intensive care units and growing care units: a multicenter observational study.Fujita medical journal · 2026Article
- Superiority of long peripheral catheters over short peripheral catheters for completing planned infusion therapy in late preterm and term neonates: a retrospective cohort study with competing-risk analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal-short peripheral intravenous catheters (n-SPCs) and neonatal-long peripheral intravenous catheters (n-LPCs) are widely used for short-term vascular access in neonates. A retrospective single-centred cohort study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit between 2019 and 2022 to compare the 2 types of catheters. A total of 34,464 catheter insertions were analysed (32,885 n-SPCs, 1,579 n-LPCs). n-LPCs had longer dwell time (48:27 ± 39:08 h versus 34:01 ± 33:31 h, p < 0.001). Accidental removals were lower in n-LPCs (0.3% versus 2.6%, p < 0.001). n-LPCs had higher rates of phlebitis (16.1% versus 6.6%, p < 0.001) and peripheral intravenous infiltration or extravasation (PIVIE) rate (40.0% versus 29.9%). Severe PIVIE (≥ 30% severity) was higher in n-LPCs (8.5% versus 2.8%, p < 0.001). n-LPCs offer a more stable and effective option for peripheral vascular access in neonates. Their use should be balanced with strategies to reduce the risk of phlebitis and severe PIVIE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.