Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316544›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Restoring flowcell type and basecaller configuration from FASTQ files of nanopore sequencing data.

Jun Mencius, Wenjun Chen, Youqi Zheng, Tingyi An, Yongguo Yu, Kun Sun, Huijuan Feng, Zhixing Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jun Mencius *Department of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-4737
Wenjun Chen *Department of Clinical Genetics, Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3537-095X
Youqi ZhengDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tingyi AnDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yongguo YuDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. yuyongguo@xinhuamed.com.cn.
Kun SunDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. sunkun@xinhuamed.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0504-7372
Huijuan FengDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. huijuanfeng@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-560X
Zhixing FengDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. fengzhixing@shsmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0308-8549

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32470684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As nanopore sequencing has been widely adopted, data accumulation has surged, resulting in over 700,000 public datasets. While these data hold immense potential for advancing genomic research, their utility is compromised by the absence of flowcell type and basecaller configuration in about 85% of the data and associated publications. These parameters are essential for many analysis algorithms, and their misapplication can lead to significant drops in performance. To address this issue, we present LongBow, designed to infer flowcell type and basecaller configuration directly from the base quality value patterns of FASTQ files. LongBow has been tested on 66 in-house basecalled FAST5/POD5 datasets and 1989 public FASTQ datasets, achieving accuracies of 95.33% and 91.45%, respectively. We demonstrate its utility by reanalyzing nanopore sequencing data from the COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) project. The results show that LongBow is essential for reproducing reported genomic variants and, through a LongBow-based analysis pipeline, we discovered substantially more functionally important variants while improving accuracy in lineage assignment. Overall, LongBow is poised to play a critical role in maximizing the utility of public nanopore sequencing data, while significantly enhancing the reproducibility of related research.

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingSARS-CoV-2AlgorithmsCOVID-19GenomicsHumansNanoporesSequence Analysis, DNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID40316544
PMCPMC12048652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.