Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316520›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2025

Leptospirosis.

Senaka Rajapakse, Narmada Fernando, Anou Dreyfus, Chris Smith, Chaturaka Rodrigo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Environmental formermSystems · 2026
    Article
  11. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Phylogenetic evidence of possible zoonotic circulation ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  18. High Positivity Rate forTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Senaka RajapakseDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka. senaka@med.cmb.ac.lk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-6678
Narmada FernandoInstitute of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5899-9564
Anou DreyfusSection of Epidemiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-7736
Chris SmithDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-3202
Chaturaka RodrigoDepartment of Pathology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-9177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic bacterial infection that is prevalent across all continents and is caused by pathogenic spirochaetes of the genus Leptospira. Although infection can be asymptomatic, symptomatic disease can vary in severity from mild to severe illness, the latter characterized by icterus and/or multi-organ dysfunction and potentially death. An estimated one million cases of leptospirosis occur globally each year, resulting in ~60,000 deaths. The pathogenesis of severe leptospirosis is poorly understood but is believed to involve an interplay between genetic predisposition, pathogen virulence and dysregulated immune responses that trigger a cytokine storm with associated immunoparesis. Leptospira are susceptible to several low-cost antibiotics, including benzyl penicillin, doxycycline, cephalosporins and macrolides, when used in the early phase of infection. Late disease with organ dysfunction is treated with supportive care, and the benefit of antibiotics during late disease is doubtful. Very few countries have licensed a vaccine for human leptospirosis, and available vaccines only protect against rodent-associated serogroups. Exposure control by behavioural modifications and personal protective measures are the major preventative measures in leptospirosis, and the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics has not been confirmed in clinical trials. Future research is needed to accurately estimate leptospirosis disease burden across the globe, to understand the pathophysiology of severe leptospirosis to inform the design of targeted immunotherapies and vaccines, and to develop cost-effective and accurate point-of-care diagnostics.

Indexed as

LeptospirosisAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansLeptospiraAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.