ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Assessment of the effect of physical activity on intraocular pressure using a novel implanted telemetric pressure sensor.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to technical limitations of commonly used tonometry devices, the effects of physical exercise on intraocular pressure (IOP) have never been studied during exercise. This study continuously monitored IOP variations in patients with glaucoma during physical exercise using an implanted IOP microsensor.
methodsIn total, 10 participants (six male and four female) with open-angle glaucoma (age range: 67-79), previously implanted with an IOP sensor, were included. We monitored IOP telemetrically during a 10 min session on a bicycle ergometer with a stepwise power increase from 0 to 75 W, in 25 W increments, at 2 min intervals. We also recorded IOP during the 2 min resting period after the exercise compared with resting baseline before exercise.
resultsThe average IOP increased from 15.4±1.3 mm Hg at rest to 18.0±1.3 mm Hg at 75 W and returned to 14.4±1.0 mm Hg during the resting period after exercise. During the resting period after the activity, average IOP reduced below baseline in 8 out of 10 patients (ΔIOP=-0.98±0.57 mm Hg, p=0.12). Both systolic blood pressure and heart rate were highly correlated with IOP during the exercise (R
conclusionsIn our study, IOP, heart rate and blood pressure increased and decreased with physical intensity, suggesting these parameters are closely linked and potentially driven by a common mechanism during aerobic exercise. Further studies with larger patient groups are warranted to better understand the mechanisms involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.