ArticleBMJ mental health2025
Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in acute mental health service use in Canada, 2004-2019: a nationally representative retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute mental health service use (AMHSU), that is, hospitalisations and emergency department (ED) visits for mental health, have been rising in the Canadian province of Ontario and globally; however, national-level estimates are not available. We examine trends and socioeconomic inequalities in AMHSU in the Canadian adult population between 2004 and 2019.
methodsUsing the Canadian Community Health Survey linked to tax and health administrative datasets, we reported prevalence rates of AMHSU using negative binomial regression models. Income-based absolute inequalities in AMHSU were reported using the Slope Index of Inequality.
resultsOver the study period, hospitalisations for mood disorders decreased from 144.8 (95% CI: 116.0-173.7) to 67.5 (95% CI: 54.5-80.4) per 100 000, while those for substance-related disorders (SRD) increased. Rates of ED visits increased for all conditions, with the largest increase for anxiety disorders, from 252.3 (95% CI: 210.9-293.6) to 434.1 (95% CI: 382.2-486.1) per 100 000. Females had higher rates of hospitalisations and ED visits for all conditions except SRD. We found pronounced income-based inequalities in both hospitalisations and ED visits for mental health, comparing those at the top versus bottom of the income distribution. Absolute inequalities for hospitalisations widened for SRD, from -93.6 (95% CI: -131.1 to -56.1) to -135.2 (95% CI: -203.4 to -67.1) per 100 000, and decreased for mood disorders, from -309.5 (95% CI: -443.8 to -175.3) to -126.0 (95% CI: -182.0 to -69.9) per 100 000. Additionally, absolute inequalities increased for ED visits across all mental health conditions.
conclusionInterventions aimed at improving access to preventive services could mitigate observed inequalities in AMHSU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.