Observational studyBMJ open2025
Household determinants of delayed MMR vaccination: longitudinal analysis using electronic health records in North East London, UK.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is a lack of information about household factors associated with delayed measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination. We examined whether timeliness of first MMR (MMR1) receipt is associated with sharing a household with an older child with non-receipt of MMR1 independent of household composition and size.
designLongitudinal observational study using linked electronic health records.
settingNorth East London, UK.
participantsThe index cohort comprised 71 509 children (51.0% males) eligible to receive MMR1 between 1 January 2014 and 28 February 2020.
methodsThe primary outcome was MMR1 receipt between 12 months and 24 months of age. The explanatory variable was non-receipt of MMR1 between age 12 months and 24 months in the oldest child sharing the same household. We examined the likelihood of MMR1 receipt in index children sharing a household with an older child with non-receipt of MMR1 between 12 months and 24 months using logistic regression to estimate ORs and 95% CIs before and after adjustment for individual-level, household-level and area-level covariates. We carried out sensitivity analyses excluding households with an age interval between oldest and youngest child greater than 5 years.
results59 851 (83.6%) index children received MMR1 between 12 months and 24 months of age. After adjustment for household composition and size, MMR1 receipt was less likely in index children sharing a household with an older child with non-receipt of MMR1 between 12 months and 24 months of age: OR: 0.19 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.20). This association strengthened after excluding households with an age interval greater than 5 years: OR: 0.14 (0.13, 0.15).
conclusionsThere is strong concordance within households of delay in MMR1 receipt independent of household size and composition. Lack of timely protection within households increases the risk of measles outbreaks. There is a need for household-based interventions to improve MMR1 timeliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.