Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40316348›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

A phase I, open-label, multicentre, first-in-human study to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of AMG 404, a PD-1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Timothy Price, Iwona Lugowska, Sant P Chawla, Gerald Falchook, Vivek Subbiah, Jose G Monzon, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Mun Hui, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Rafal Dziadziuszko and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03853109 (A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of AMG 404, a Programmed Death-1), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03853109 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of AMG 404, a Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) Antibody, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2019 to 2023Enrolled171ConditionsAdvanced Solid TumorsArmsAMG 404
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Timothy PriceThe Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Adelaide, Australia timothy.price@sa.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-2693
Iwona LugowskaMaria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.
Sant P ChawlaSarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Gerald FalchookSarah Cannon Research Institute at HealthONE, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Vivek SubbiahUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jose G MonzonTom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hendrik-Tobias ArkenauSarah Cannon Research Institute and Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Mun HuiChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Yasutoshi KubokiNational Cancer Center-Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3675-953X
Rafal DziadziuszkoMedical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Ryota ShibakiWakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Min Hee HongYonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3490-2195
Daniel TanNational Cancer Centre Singapore, SingHealth, and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Caio Max Rocha LimaWake Forest University Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Kejia WangAmgen, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Antreas HindoyanAmgen, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Weibing ShiAmgen Inc San Francisco, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Hansen WongAmgen Inc San Francisco, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Mira KistlerAmgen Inc San Francisco, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Hans PrenenUniversity Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary antitumour activity of AMG 404, a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death-1, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

designFirst-in-human phase I study comprising eight dose expansion cohorts, including cohorts with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours and non-small cell lung cancer with high programmed death-ligand 1 expression (NSCLC/PDL1-H, tumour proportion score ≥50%).

settingConducted across 28 global sites.

participantsThis study enrolled adult patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation. The inclusion criteria included a life expectancy of >3 months, ≥1 measurable or evaluable lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) V.1.1, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2 and adequate haematological, renal and hepatic function. Patients with prior treatment with checkpoint inhibitors, primary brain tumour or untreated or symptomatic brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease and history of other malignancy within the past 2 years were excluded.

interventionsThe planned doses were 240 mg, 480 mg and 1050 mg of AMG 404 administered every 4 weeks (Q4W). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, changes in vital signs and clinical laboratory tests. Secondary endpoints included PK parameters, incidence of antidrug (AMG 404) antibodies and antitumour activity assessed per modified RECIST V.1.1 (objective response, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), disease control and duration of stable disease).

resultsA total of 171 patients were enrolled; 168 were treated. Median (range) follow-up was 36.3 weeks (1.6-137.1). No DLTs were observed. Grade 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16 (9.5%) and 12 (7.1%) patients, respectively. The 480 mg Q4W dose was selected as the recommended phase II dose. AMG 404 serum exposure increased approximately dose proportionally. The objective response rate (80% CI) was 19.6% (15.7-24.1) for the overall population and 36.6% (26.4-47.8) and 30.8% (14.2-‍52.3) for cohorts with MSI-H tumours (n=41) and NSCLC/PDL1-H (n=13), respectively. The overall disease control rate (80% CI) was 54.8% (49.5-59.9). The median (80% CI) PFS was 3.7 (3.5-4.5) months for the overall population and 14.8 (9.0-not estimable) and 4.4 (2.2-9.7) months for cohorts with MSI-H tumours and NSCLC/PDL1-H, respectively.

conclusionsAMG 404 monotherapy was tolerable at the tested doses, with encouraging antitumour activity observed across tumour types. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03853109.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorGastrointestinal tumoursIMMUNOLOGYMolecular aspectsRespiratory tract tumours

Identifiers

PMID40316348
PMCPMC12049887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.