Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40315956›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2025

Disrupted flexible use of context-dependent relational memory in adults following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.

Hillary Schwarb, Michael Dulas, Nirav Patel, Nathaniel A Bouton, Neal J Cohen, Melissa C Duff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hillary SchwarbDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA; Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: hschwarb2@unl.edu.
Michael DulasDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Nirav PatelDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Nathaniel A BoutonDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Neal J CohenDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; Carle-Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Melissa C DuffDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Relational Memory as a Model of Behavioral (Dys)Function in Adults with Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS110661 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COHEN, NEAL J., DUFF, MELISSA C · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning associative information and extracting regularities from that remembered information to adaptively meet goals is a hallmark of navigating life. Adaptive goal-directive behavior has been historically attributed to prefrontal functions, and more recently to hippocampal relational memory. Disruptions in either of these systems, both frequently seen in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), have far reaching consequences in everyday life. In the current study, we investigate the impact of chronic, moderate-to-severe TBI on both relational memory processes as well as the ability to use regularities or rules extracted from that remembered information to guide behavior via both overt responses and eye-tracking. Individuals with and without TBI completed a context-dependent relational memory task designed to assess both 1) the formation and organization of overlapping relational associations (hippocampal-dependent); and 2) the acquisition and flexible use of learned, context-dependent rules (ventromedial prefrontal-dependent). Behavioral measures revealed that relative to neurotypical matched comparison participants, participants with TBI were significantly impaired on context-dependent relational memory measures, but showed spared memory guided rule-use. Eye-tracking data indicated largely intact information gathering at study for participants with TBI, but impaired flexibility at test leading to poor behavioral outcomes. Critically, these data suggest that relational memory impairment is a significant source of behavioral dysfunction in TBI, which likely contributes to poor outcomes in both laboratory testing and real-life, long-term trajectories following injury. Furthermore, this study highlights the feasibility and strength of incorporating eye-tracking into studies of TBI to gain novel insights into information gathering and use across time.

Indexed as

Association LearningBrain Injuries, TraumaticMemory DisordersAdultEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsYoung AdultEye-trackingMemory guided rule-useRelational memoryTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40315956
PMCPMC12911441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.