ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
PSTP: accurate residue-level phase separation prediction using protein conformational and language model embeddings.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched benchmarking of phase-separating protein predictors.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Rethinking bioinformatics in liquid-liquid phase separation: data resources, predictive models, and an event-centric perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Small molecules modulate the biomolecular condensates and liquid‒liquid phase separation.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phase separation (PS) is essential in cellular processes and disease mechanisms, highlighting the need for predictive algorithms to analyze uncharacterized sequences and accelerate experimental validation. Current high-accuracy methods often rely on extensive annotations or handcrafted features, limiting their generalizability to sequences lacking such annotations and making it difficult to identify key protein regions involved in PS. We introduce Phase Separation's Transfer-learning Prediction (PSTP), which combines conformational embeddings with large language model embeddings, enabling state-of-the-art PS predictions from protein sequences alone. PSTP performs well across various prediction scenarios and shows potential for predicting novel-designed artificial proteins. Additionally, PSTP provides residue-level predictions that are highly correlated with experimentally validated PS regions. By analyzing 160 000+ variants, PSTP characterizes the strong link between the incidence of pathogenic variants and residue-level PS propensities in unconserved intrinsically disordered regions, offering insights into underexplored mutation effects. PSTP's sliding-window optimization reduces its memory usage to a few hundred megabytes, facilitating rapid execution on typical CPUs and GPUs. Offered via both a web server and an installable Python package, PSTP provides a versatile tool for decoding protein PS behavior and supporting disease-focused research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.