ArticleBlood advances2025
Impact of shared HLA determinants between patient and losing cord blood unit on relapse after double cord blood transplantation.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Allogeneic stem cell transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in patients with acute myeloid leukemia achieving first complete remission after one versus two inductions: a study from the ALWP/EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Don't Cut the Cord: Why Umbilical Cord Blood Still Deserves a Place in Transplantation.International journal of immunogenetics · 2026Review
- Three in a bed and changing allogeneic transplant outcomes with a second, non-engrafting cell source.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- HLA vaccine effect in double cord blood transplant: a Chinese cohort.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Targeted GVL through HLA mismatch in double cord blood transplant.Blood advances · 2025Article
- HLA-vaccine transplantations for refractory leukemia: beyond double-unit cord blood.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractDuring double umbilical cord blood transplant (DUCBT), the winning unit (WU) rejects the losing unit (LU) because of WU T cells directed against the LU mismatched HLA. This immune response might protect against relapse, especially when the patient and LU (PT-LU) share the same mismatch with the WU. To validate this hypothesis, a retrospective Eurocord study, conducted on 383 DUCBTs, focused on posttransplant relapse and HLA mismatches between PT-LU and the WU. A PT-LU HLA-A mismatch shared with the WU was associated with a lower 7-year relapse incidence (16% vs 28%; P = .048). In addition, multiple PT-LU shared HLA mismatches were also associated with a lower relapse risk (7% vs 29%; P = .003). In DUCBT with ≥2 HLA mismatches between patient and WU, the number of HLA mismatches between those did not significantly affect relapse incidence, whereas multiple PT-LU shared HLA mismatches remained associated with a lower relapse risk (7% vs 29%; P = .0038). Finally, considering patients who did not develop either grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease or chronic graft-versus-host disease, a PT-LU shared HLA-A mismatch as well as multiple PT-LU HLA mismatches shared with the WU remained associated with a significantly lower 7-year relapse incidence. In multivariate adjusted analyses multiple PT-LU shared HLA mismatches remained associated with a significantly reduced 7-year posttransplant relapse risk. Our analysis indicates that, during DUCBT, PT-LU shared HLA mismatches prime an immune response of the WU against leukemia, reducing the long-term risk of posttransplant relapse, and that DCBT has particular utility in those with high-risk leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.