ArticlePloS one2025
Identification of stable reference genes in Edwardsiella ictaluri for accurate gene expression analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Edwardsiella ictaluri is a Gram-negative bacterium causing enteric septicemia of catfish (ESC), leading to significant economic losses in the catfish farming industry. RT-PCR analysis is a powerful technique for quantifying gene expression, but normalization of expression data is critical to control experimental errors. Using stable reference genes, also known as housekeeping genes, is a common strategy for normalization, yet reference gene selection often lacks proper validation. In this work, our goal was to determine the most stable reference genes in E. ictaluri during catfish serum exposure and various growth phases. To this goal, we evaluated the expression of 27 classical reference genes (16S rRNA, abcZ, adk, arc, aroE, aspA, atpA, cyaA, dnaG, fumC, g6pd, gdhA, glnA, gltA, glyA, grpE, gyrB, mdh, mutS, pgi, pgm, pntA, recA, recP, rpoS, tkt, and tpi) using five analytical programs (GeNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder, Comparative ΔCT, and Comprehensive Ranking). Results showed that aspA, atpA, dnaG, glyA, gyrB, mutS, recP, rpoS, tkt, and tpi were the most stable reference genes during serum exposure, whereas fumC, g6pd, gdhA, glnA, and mdh were the least stable. During various growth phases, aspA, g6pd, glyA, gyrB, mdh, mutS, pgm, recA, recP, and tkt were the most stable, while 16S rRNA, atpA, grpE, and tpi were the least stable. At least four analysis methods confirmed the stability of aspA, glyA, gyrB, mutS, recP, and tkt during serum exposure and different growth stages. However, no consensus was found among the programs for unstable reference genes under both conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.