ArticlePloS one2025
Effect of ozone application on bovine carcasses in abattoir cold chambers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Different technologies have been evaluated to promote food safety and improve the microbiological quality and shelf life of food. The aim of this work was to determine the effect of gaseous ozone on beef carcass weight loss and indicator microorganism counts in an exporting abattoir. Two gaseous ozone concentrations (3 and 10 ppm) were applied on carcasses from Experiment 1 (Exp. 1, n = 100 test, n = 100 control) and Experiment 2 (Exp. 2, n = 100 test, n = 100 control), respectively. Cold chamber without ozone was used as control in both experiments. For mesophilic aerobic organism (MAO), coliform and Escherichia coli counts, 100 cm2 of each carcass was swabbed before and 10, 20 and 30 h after ozone application. In Exp. 1, the carcass entire surface was swabbed for Shiga-toxin (stx) gene detection. The counts of MAO were influenced by treatment and sampling time in both experiments. In Exp. 1, control carcasses had higher counts than ozonated carcasses at all sampling times, whereas the opposite occurred in Exp. 2. Coliform count was affected by sampling time in Exp. 2, whereas E. coli count was not affected in any experiment. All samples analyzed were stx-negative. Differences in carcass weight loss were not significant. In conclusion, gaseous ozone was not effective to reduce bacterial load or carcass weight loss. To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating ozone effect on beef carcasses conducted in a commercial abattoir, not at laboratory scale. Future research would help demonstrate whether the use of ozone impacts on the quality and sensory characteristics of beef.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.