ArticlePloS one2025
A hybrid TCN-XGBoost model for agricultural product market price forecasting.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Price volatility in agricultural markets is influenced by seasonality, supply-demand fluctuations, policy changes, and climate. These factors significantly impact agricultural production and the broader macroeconomy. Traditional time series models, limited by linear assumptions, often fail to capture the nonlinear nature of price fluctuations. To address this limitation, we propose an integrated forecasting model that combines TCN and XGBoost to improve the accuracy of agricultural price volatility predictions. TCN captures both short-term and long-term dependencies using convolutional operations, while XGBoost enhances its ability to model nonlinear relationships. The model uses 65,750 historical data points from rice, wheat, and corn, with a sliding window technique to construct time series features. Experimental results demonstrate that the TCN-XGBoost model significantly outperforms traditional models such as ARIMA (RMSE = 0.36, MAPE = 8.9%) and LSTM (RMSE = 0.34, MAPE = 8.1%). It also outperforms other hybrid models, such as Transformer-XGBoost (RMSE = 0.23) and CNN-XGBoost (RMSE = 0.29). Specifically, the TCN-XGBoost model achieves an RMSE of 0.26 and a MAPE of 5.3%, underscoring its superior performance. Moreover, the model shows robust performance across various market conditions, particularly during significant price fluctuations. During dramatic price movements, the RMSE is 0.28 and the MAPE is 6.1%, effectively capturing both trends and magnitudes of price changes. By leveraging TCN's strength in temporal feature extraction and XGBoost's capability to model complex nonlinear relationships, the TCN-XGBoost integrated model offers an efficient and robust solution for forecasting agricultural prices. This model has broad applicability, particularly in agricultural market decision-making and risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.