ArticlePloS one2025
Spatiotemporal and kinetic characteristics during maximal sprint running in fast running soccer players.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Speed and Distance Redistribution-Lower Limb Power Strategy in Single-Leg-Approach Jumps.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate spatiotemporal and kinetic variables in fast-running soccer players in comparison with sprinters or slow-running soccer players. Sixty-seven male soccer players and 17 male sprinters (Sp) performed 60-m maximal effort sprint running. The soccer players were classified into three groups: high-speed (SOCHigh), medium-speed, and low-speed (SOCLow). The antero-posterior and vertical ground reaction forces were measured with a 50-m long force plates system at every step during the sprint. Step length and step frequency were also computed from the position of center of pressure, contact time, and flight time. During the initial acceleration phase, SOCHigh exhibited similar running speeds to Sp. This was attributed to a higher step frequency in SOCHigh compared to Sp, while net antero-posterior impulse was lower in the former than in the later. In the range of running speed from 7.5 m/s to 8.5 m/s, net antero-posterior impulse for SOCHigh was similar to that for Sp. At 9.0 m/s, SOCHigh exhibited a lower net antero-posterior impulse compared to Sp, primarily due to a reduced propulsive impulse. Additionally, vertical impulse during the braking phase was larger in SOCHigh compared to Sp, due to a longer braking time, while vertical impulse during the propulsive phase was smaller, due to a tendency for a reduced propulsive time and vertical force during the corresponding phase. Compared to SOCLow, SOCHigh exhibited higher step frequency through sprint running and longer step lengths from the 2nd acceleration phase to maximal speed phase. Additionally, net antero-posterior impulse at the same running speed was greater in SOCHigh compared to SOCLow. Vertical impulse was lower during the braking phase but higher during the propulsive phase in SOCHigh than in SOCLow. Thus, the sprint mechanics of SOCHigh is characterized by a similar ability of speed acquisition up to the 2nd acceleration as sprinters. However, at 9.0 m/s or over, SOCHigh exhibits a greater vertical impulse, leading to a lower step frequency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.