Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40315240›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An image processing technique for optimizing industrial defect detection using dehazing algorithms.

Xuanyi Zhao, Xiaohan Dou, Gengpei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuanyi ZhaoYangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Xiaohan DouYangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Gengpei ZhangYangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6175-4100

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the demand for efficient and accurate defect detection algorithms in industrial production has been increasing. However, industrial cameras may be affected by water fog during image acquisition, resulting in image blurring and quality degradation, which increases the difficulty of defect detection. This paper proposes an industrial defect detection algorithm incorporating dehazing technology to enhance detection performance in complex environments. Experimental results show that using an optimized dehazing processing method on industrial images affected by water fog achieves an average PSNR of 34.9 dB and an SSIM of 0.951. The overall performance surpasses CNN and MADNet models, and verification using the improved YOLOv8 model significantly enhances defect detection confidence while greatly reducing missed detections. Further research indicates that this method is not only applicable to industrial defect detection but can also be transferred to personnel localization and rescue tasks in fire and smoke environments. This study provides a novel technical approach for industrial defect detection in complex environments and offers valuable references for image processing and object detection tasks in other fields.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIndustryHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40315240
PMCPMC12047806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.