Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40315233›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Susceptibility of diverse sand fly species to Toscana virus.

Magdalena Jancarova, Nikola Polanska, Adrien Thiesson, Frédérick Arnaud, Marketa Stejskalova, Marketa Rehbergerova, Alain Kohl, Barbara Viginier, Petr Volf, Maxime Ratinier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Magdalena JancarovaLaboratory of Vector Biology, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0273-3446
Nikola PolanskaLaboratory of Vector Biology, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Adrien ThiessonIVPC UMR754, INRAE, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, EPHE, Université PSL, Lyon, France.
Frédérick ArnaudIVPC UMR754, INRAE, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, EPHE, Université PSL, Lyon, France.
Marketa StejskalovaLaboratory of Vector Biology, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marketa RehbergerovaLaboratory of Vector Biology, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alain KohlMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Barbara ViginierIVPC UMR754, INRAE, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, EPHE, Université PSL, Lyon, France.
Petr VolfLaboratory of Vector Biology, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Maxime RatinierIVPC UMR754, INRAE, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, EPHE, Université PSL, Lyon, France.

Funding

Control of Vector-Borne Diseases, H2020European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programmeEuropean Virus Archive Global (EVA-GLOBAL)UK Medical Research Council MC_UU_00034/4UK Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toscana virus (TOSV) is an emerging but neglected human pathogen currently circulating around the Mediterranean basin including North Africa. Human illness ranges from asymptomatic or mild flu-like syndromes to severe neurological diseases such as meningitis or meningoencephalitis. Despite its significant impact, understanding of TOSV transmission and epidemiology remains limited. Sand flies (Diptera: Phlebotominae), specifically Phlebotomus perniciosus and Phlebotomus perfiliewi, are believed to be the primary vectors of TOSV. However, the spread of TOSV to new geographical areas and its detection in other sand fly species suggest that additional species play a role in the circulation and transmission of this virus. This study investigated the vector competence of four sand fly species - P. tobbi, P. sergenti, P. papatasi, and Sergentomyia schwetzi - for two TOSV strains: 1500590 (TOSV A lineage) and MRS20104319501 (TOSV B lineage). Sand flies were orally challenged with TOSV via bloodmeals. None of the tested species showed susceptibility to the TOSV A strain. However, for TOSV B strain, P. tobbi demonstrated a high potential as a new vector, exhibiting high infection and dissemination rates. P. sergenti also showed some susceptibility to TOSV B, with the virus dissemination observed in all infected females. These finding suggests that P. tobbi and P. sergenti are new potential vectors for TOSV B. Given that P. tobbi and P. sergenti are the primary vectors of human leishmaniases in the Balkans, Turkey and Middle East, their susceptibility to TOSV could have significant epidemiological consequences. On the other hand, P. papatasi and S. schwetzi appeared refractory to TOSV B infection. Refractoriness of P. papatasi, a highly anthropophilic species distributed from the Mediterranean to the Middle East and India, suggests that this species does not contribute to TOSV circulation.

Indexed as

Insect VectorsPhlebotomusPsychodidaeSandfly fever Naples virusAnimalsFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID40315233
PMCPMC12047804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.