Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40315219›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Research on the supply-demand balance evaluation and driving mechanism of community public service facilities.

Jian Chen, Ying Fu, Shenglan Ma, Qiao Chen, Wanqing Zhang, Junlin Huang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jian ChenHunan Sida Yuan Planning Consulting Research Co., Ltd, Changsha, China.
Ying FuSchool of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0021-613X
Shenglan MaSchool of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Qiao ChenSchool of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Wanqing ZhangSchool of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Junlin HuangSchool of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1699-1630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The configuration level of community-level public service facilities is an important indicator for assessing the completeness of the urban public service system, and its spatial equilibrium directly impacts residents' quality of life. This study takes 400 living circles in Changsha as samples and, based on the theory of "spatial equilibrium," applies CRITIC method, system coordination model, and geographic detector to systematically evaluate the "supply-demand" equilibrium of community-level public service facilities. The study finds that: (1) The supply of public service facilities exhibits spatial agglomeration characteristics, while the demand distribution is significantly dispersed, with regional heterogeneity in the supply-demand matching; (2) There is a "Matthew effect" in the configuration of facilities, with significant equilibrium differences between the central urban areas and suburban regions; (3) The coverage of bus stops, farmers' markets, and multifunctional sports fields are key driving factors, and transportation convenience and daily demand satisfaction are the core pathways to improving equilibrium. This study, by constructing a dynamic "supply-demand" adaptation framework, reveals the spatial equilibrium characteristics of community-level public service facilities and provides systematic planning ideas for optimizing urban public service resource allocation.

Indexed as

Public FacilitiesChinaHumansTransportation

Identifiers

PMID40315219
PMCPMC12047832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.