ArticlePloS one2025
Service user perspectives and experiences of their diagnosis of psychotic major depression: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence suggests psychotic major depression can be overlooked in clinical settings and thus lead to delays in diagnosis. There have been multiple theories about why this happens, however no research has investigated this from a service users' perspective.
aimsThe aim of this study was to explore service users' perspectives and experiences of their diagnosis of psychotic major depression. Where there appeared to be a substantial delay between initial symptoms and diagnosis, reasons for this was explored in depth.
methodsThis study used a qualitative approach based on semi-structured interviews with service users diagnosed with psychotic major depression. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsTen interviews were conducted. Four overarching themes were identified: difficulty retelling the story, barriers to symptom identification, experiences following disclosure, responses to diagnosis. The theme of barriers to symptom identification highlighted that psychotic symptoms can be overlooked in the diagnostic process. Service users reported that health professionals do not always check for psychotic symptoms in clinical assessments. Service users have difficulty verbalising their symptoms, or find it difficult to disclose due to stigma, fear or shame. Short/rushed appointments, lack of consistency with health professionals, being moved between services and medicalising language made disclosure of psychotic symptoms less likely.
conclusionsPsychotic major depression should be actively considered as a differential diagnosis by healthcare professionals when assessing an individual for unipolar depression. Healthcare professionals should be mindful of the specific barriers to disclosure of psychotic symptoms, and building rapport should be prioritised to facilitate disclosure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.