Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40315209›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Urgency enforces stimulus-driven action across spatial and numerical cognitive control tasks.

Anika Krause, Christian H Poth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Contributions of Distinct Attention Mechanisms to Saccadic Choices in a Gamified, Dynamic Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The forced-response method: Urgency rediscovered.Behavior research methods · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anika KrauseDifferential Psychology, Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1770-5448
Christian H PothNeuro-Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been shown that urgency in cognitive control tasks elicits a time-window in which responses are dominated by stimuli rather than goals. If stimulus information conflicts with goal-relevant information, urgency impairs goal-directed responses. This was shown for an antisaccade task as well as tasks using manual responses. Critically, however, all previous studies on manual responses used arrows as stimuli, leaving it unclear whether urgency affects cognitive control also in tasks using different stimuli. Here, we show that the urgency effect can also be elicited in three cognitive control tasks that do not use arrow stimuli. Participants completed either a Spatial Stroop task with word stimuli, in which they reacted to the word meaning while ignoring the spatial position, or a Numerical Stroop Task, in which they had to respond to the numerically larger of two presented numbers. The physical size of the numbers varied but was irrelevant to the task. The third task was a Simon task, where participants were instructed to react to the color of a stimulus while ignoring its spatial position. In all tasks, urgency evoked a time window, in which the position or the physical size dominated the response, which was evident from a drop of performance below chance level in conflict situations. These results reveal that the effect of urgency on cognitive control does not depend on arrow stimuli and emerges in a number of other spatially related tasks, specifically in spatial and numerical cognitive control tasks. As such, they suggest that urgency affects cognitive control more generally.

Indexed as

CognitionAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSpace PerceptionStroop TestYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40315209
PMCPMC12047772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.