ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Integrating community health workers to sustain malaria services in the Greater Mekong Subregion: Findings from implementer case studies.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many countries in the Asia Pacific rely on community health workers (CHWs) to care for various health needs. In the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS), malaria CHWs have been an essential component of malaria elimination. Yet as the malaria burden declines, the role of malaria CHWs in local health systems and communities is changing. There is a need to expand malaria CHW roles to take on the provision of health services beyond malaria. This study sought to understand the process and experience of this role expansion including implementation, financing, policy, and sustainability within the Asia Pacific region. We documented malaria CHW programs that included health services in addition to malaria. We conducted 21 key-stakeholder interviews from thirteen programs in eight countries throughout the Asia Pacific region virtually in English and findings were analyzed using rapid-matrix analysis. Participants were recruited by an online landscaping survey, with an inclusion criterion of five + years' work experience and English speaking. Governments ran five of the thirteen programs; six were international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), and two were academic. Senior staff from programs that have expanded roles of malaria CHWs or integrated CHW programs explained expansion processes, challenges, and opportunities. We found that integration can occur in multiple program domains and does not necessarily occur in all domains simultaneously. We identified entry points for role expansion: integrated policy and financing, planning, assessments, and research. Operational entry points included the selection, training, motivation, management, supervision, and monitoring of CHWs. Enabling factors included decentralized management structures, health system linkages, commodity provision and referral procedures, and community engagement. While there is not a linear or unique path towards integration, we provide considerations for the policy level, practical implementation steps, and enabling factors for countries in the GMS to consider as they move towards sustainable, integrated malaria CHWs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.