ArticlePloS one2025
Are people willing to take regular vaccinations? A qualitative study among diverse ethnic groups in Hong Kong.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a Theory- and Evidence-Based, Motivational Interviewing-Oriented Artificial Intelligence Digital Assistant on Vaccine Attitudes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Upward intergenerational support and vaccination decisions among community-dwelling older adults in China: A multicenter qualitative study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy is identified as one of the top ten global health threats by the World Health Organization. The emergence of new coronavirus variants and evidence of waning immunity offered by COVID-19 vaccines draw attention to the need for regular vaccinations. This study aimed to understand the people's hesitancy towards regular COVID-19 vaccination among diverse ethnic groups of citizens in Hong Kong. A qualitative descriptive research approach was adopted. Content analysis was used for data analysis. A purposive sample of fifteen participants, aged 20-75, with diverse ethnicities (Chinese, Palestinian, British, French and Indian) joined the study. Their barriers and hesitancy toward taking the COVID-19 vaccination included personal beliefs and biases, policies and ethical considerations, and concerns about vaccines and vaccination. Collaborative efforts of governments, health policymakers, healthcare providers, media sources and vaccine manufacturers are required to decrease vaccine hesitancy. Cultural values and ethical issues should be considered in vaccine promotion. This study contributes to the existing body of literature by exploring vaccine hesitancy among ethnically diverse populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings provide critical insights into the underlying reasons driving vaccine hesitancy among ethnic groups in Hong Kong and support the development of targeted public health strategies to address this issue. Public health researchers and practitioners are encouraged to prioritize addressing mistrust and ethical concerns while leveraging the strengths of multicultural communities and fostering coordinated efforts among diverse organizations to reduce vaccine hesitancy against future global health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.